This morning, August 7th, On the Media had Shane Harris of The Washingtonian to prate about Wikileaks, whistleblowing and Obama's Bushian hostility to openness, transparency, democracy, rights, etc. — all the things that he endorsed during his 2008 campaign.
Below, my criticism, directly delivered to On the Media.
Pretty sad excuse for analysis on Obama and leaks, On the Media.
You utterly fail to raise key points:
1. Wikileaks says, with evidence, that it DID approach the Obama administration and Obama dismissed them.
2. No mention that there has been a steady attack on FOIA for 20 years and that Obama has joined Bush in attacking FOIA.
3. You failed to mention that by both liberal and libertarian thinking (i.e., excepting only so-called moderates and conservatives), the prevailing view is that information held by OUR government is OUR information. Pure right.
4. You clearly, but tacitly, buy into the mainstream media is right dogma. There would have been no _market_ for Wikileaks if not for the glaring, repeated, and gross failures of the New York Times, NPR, CNN and others. The Times, for example, has repeatedly buried stories until it was too late for them to have any relevant and _preventive_ effect. NPR is _worse_ -- by a long margin. And CNN -- under the 'exalted' Walter Isaacson _allowed_ the Pentagon to place what in effect were propagandists in its newsroom.
Outrageous that On the Media had not the courage or even the decency to dig any further than the shallow pandering Shane Harris.